Could you explain the difference between Optimistic vs Pessimistic locking?

Optimistic locking and pessimistic locking are two different concurrency control mechanisms used to manage concurrent access to data in a multi-user environment. They are used to prevent conflicts when multiple users or processes attempt to read and modify the same data simultaneously. Let’s explore the differences between optimistic and pessimistic locking:

Optimistic Locking:

  1. Assumption: Optimistic locking assumes that conflicts are rare, and it allows multiple users to read and modify the same data concurrently without blocking each other.
  2. Concurrency Detection: When a user wants to update a record, optimistic locking checks whether the original values of the record in the database match the current values. It does this by using a versioning mechanism (e.g., timestamp column or concurrency token) to track changes to the record.
  3. Conflict Resolution: If the original and current values match, the update is allowed to proceed, and the version information is updated to reflect the change. If the values do not match, it means another user has modified the record in the meantime, and a concurrency exception is raised.
  4. Performance and Scalability: Optimistic locking offers better performance and scalability, as it allows multiple users to work concurrently without blocking each other. However, it requires more careful handling of concurrency exceptions.

Pessimistic Locking:

  1. Assumption: Pessimistic locking assumes that conflicts are more likely to occur, and it restricts concurrent access to data by blocking other users from modifying the same records until the first user completes the update.
  2. Locking Mechanism: When a user wants to update a record, pessimistic locking explicitly locks the record, preventing other users from accessing or modifying it until the first user releases the lock. This can be achieved by using transaction isolation levels that support locking, such as Serializable or RepeatableRead.
  3. Blocking and Deadlocks: Pessimistic locking can lead to blocking and potential deadlocks if locks are held for an extended period, as other users may need to wait for the lock to be released.
  4. Safeguarding Data: Pessimistic locking ensures that only one user can modify a record at a time, reducing the risk of conflicts and inconsistent data. However, it may impact application performance, especially in high-concurrency scenarios.

Choosing Between Optimistic and Pessimistic Locking: The choice between optimistic and pessimistic locking depends on the nature of the application, the likelihood of conflicts, and the expected user experience. Optimistic locking is more suitable for scenarios where conflicts are rare, and you want to maintain better performance and concurrency. On the other hand, pessimistic locking is more appropriate when conflicts are expected, and you want to ensure strict data consistency and avoid the risk of conflicts altogether.

Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and the decision should be based on the specific requirements and characteristics of your application and the data access patterns of your users.

error: Content is protected !!